VIJAY VASANTBHAI MISTRI THROUGH IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs FAKIR MAHAMADHUSEN HUSENMASTAN — 29/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 30th March 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJAR010013012025
Filing Number
29/2025
Filing Date
14-05-2025
Registration No
29/2025
Registration Date
14-05-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAY VASANTBHAI MISTRI THROUGH IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
Adv. N H TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
FAKIR MAHAMADHUSEN HUSENMASTAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 12-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 02-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed IFFCO Tokio's execution petition for default under Order XXI, Rule 105(2) of the CPC. IFFCO Tokio sought to execute a 2019 award against Fakir Mahamadhusen but failed to provide the judgment debtor's correct address despite multiple court opportunities since February 2026, preventing effective enforcement of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed IFFCO Tokio's execution petition for default under Order XXI, Rule 105(2) of the CPC. IFFCO Tokio sought to execute a 2019 award against Fakir Mahamadhusen but failed to provide the judgment debtor's correct address despite multiple court opportunities since February 2026, preventing effective enforcement of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts