RAKESHBHAI MANILAL KALASVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 379/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAR010008152026
Filing Number
379/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
379/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-Addl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
ISRI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKESHBHAI MANILAL KALASVA
Adv. M J PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 379/2026 The court rejected petitioner Rakeshbhai Manilal Kalasva's bail application under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The petitioner faced charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12, 17 for allegedly committing rape on a minor girl (15 years 1 month old) and absconding for five years. The Special POCSO Court determined that given the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's status as the primary accused, his prolonged absence as a fugitive, and credibility concerns regarding his trial attendance, releasing him on bail would not serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 379/2026
Case Summary: 379/2026 The court rejected petitioner Rakeshbhai Manilal Kalasva's bail application under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The petitioner faced charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12, 17 for allegedly committing rape on a minor girl (15 years 1 month old) and absconding for five years. The Special POCSO Court determined that given the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's status as the primary accused, his prolonged absence as a fugitive, and credibility concerns regarding his trial attendance, releasing him on bail would not serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts