SANJAYBHAI NATUBHAI VASAVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 377/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAR010008082026
Filing Number
377/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
377/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-Addl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
668
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI NATUBHAI VASAVA
Adv. S R KHANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 377/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Court, Modasa (Aravalli District) rejected petitioner Sanjaybhai Natubhai Vasava's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient evidence in the charge sheet that the accused actively participated in a serious robbery crime on September 27, 2025, where six masked assailants looted approximately ₹3 lakh in cash and a mobile phone from a farmhouse. The court noted the accused had a criminal history, played an active role in the offense, and no compelling new grounds justified bail despite a co-accused being granted bail by the High Court. The court emphasized the seriousness of theft and robbery crimes and their societal impact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 377/2026
Case 377/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Court, Modasa (Aravalli District) rejected petitioner Sanjaybhai Natubhai Vasava's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient evidence in the charge sheet that the accused actively participated in a serious robbery crime on September 27, 2025, where six masked assailants looted approximately ₹3 lakh in cash and a mobile phone from a farmhouse. The court noted the accused had a criminal history, played an active role in the offense, and no compelling new grounds justified bail despite a co-accused being granted bail by the High Court. The court emphasized the seriousness of theft and robbery crimes and their societal impact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts