SOHANLAL S/O SADRAMBHAI PUNARAM BISNOI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 375/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAR010008042026
Filing Number
375/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
375/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-Addl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
496
Police Station
MALPUR POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOHANLAL S/O SADRAMBHAI PUNARAM BISNOI
Adv. A A SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 375/2026 - Sohanlal v. State of Gujarat The court rejected the regular bail application of Sohanlal under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The petitioner was arrested with 437.04 kg of cannabis valued at ₹13,12,200 in a case involving serious NDPS Act violations, firearms offenses, and police firing incidents. The court found the charges grave and determined that granting bail was neither just nor appropriate given the severity of the allegations and evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 375/2026
Case Summary: 375/2026 - Sohanlal v. State of Gujarat The court rejected the regular bail application of Sohanlal under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The petitioner was arrested with 437.04 kg of cannabis valued at ₹13,12,200 in a case involving serious NDPS Act violations, firearms offenses, and police firing incidents. The court found the charges grave and determined that granting bail was neither just nor appropriate given the severity of the allegations and evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts