RAMESHBHAI LALUBHAI TARAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D S PATEL — 356/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAR010007542026
Filing Number
356/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
356/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
291
Police Station
SHAMLAJI POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESHBHAI LALUBHAI TARAR
Adv. V P DAMOR
JIVABHAI LALUBHAI TARAR
AJITBHAI SANKARBHAI TARAR
RUMALBHAI ALIAS KANTIBHAI KADVABHAI KHARADI
JIGNESHBHAI ALIAS JAGADISHBHAI RUMALBHAI ALIAS KANTIBHAI KADVABHAI KHARADI
JAYANTIBHAI JIVABHAI KHARADI
VIMALBHAI KHATUBHAI BHAGORA
RAJESHKUMAR VIMALBHAI BHAGORA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. No. 356/2026 Decision: The court GRANTED bail to all three applicants (Rameshbhai Lalubhai Tarar, Jivabhai Lalubhai Tarar, and Ajitbhai Sankarbhai Tarar) under Section 483 BNSS. The judge found that investigation was nearly complete with no pending recoveries, co-accused had been released on bail by the High Court (establishing parity), and applicants posed no flight risk given fixed residence. Each must furnish Rs. 15,000 bond with surety and comply with seven conditions including residence restrictions and evidence non-tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. No. 356/2026 Decision: The court GRANTED bail to all three applicants (Rameshbhai Lalubhai Tarar, Jivabhai Lalubhai Tarar, and Ajitbhai Sankarbhai Tarar) under Section 483 BNSS. The judge found that investigation was nearly complete with no pending recoveries, co-accused had been released on bail by the High Court (establishing parity), and applicants posed no flight risk given fixed residence. Each must furnish Rs. 15,000 bond with surety and comply with seven conditions including residence restrictions and evidence non-tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts