MEHULBHAI MAHESHBHAI NINAMA vs SAJID RASID Advocate - EX PARTE — 99/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJAR010007432024

Filing Number

99/2024

Filing Date

03-Apr-2024

Registration No

99/2024

Registration Date

03-Apr-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

4-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEHULBHAI MAHESHBHAI NINAMA

    Adv. K B PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAJID RASID Advocate - EX PARTE

  2. 2.NISHA ADLAKHA

    Adv. EX PARTE

  3. 3.THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. N H TRIVEDI

  4. 4.NITINKUMAR SOMABHAI NINAMA

    Adv. EX PARTE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Modasa recorded a compromise between petitioner Mehulbhai Ninama and New India Insurance Co. Ltd., awarding compensation of Rs. 3 lakh. The tribunal directed 50% to be invested as a fixed deposit for five years and 50% paid immediately via cheque/RTGS, with the insurance company depositing funds into the tribunal's designated bank account per Supreme Court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 02-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 03-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 08-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 18-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 04-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 20-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 06-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 09-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 21-Mar-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 21-Feb-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 10-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  28. 13-Dec-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  29. 08-Nov-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District Judge

  30. 09-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  31. 02-Sep-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  32. 01-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  33. 20-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  34. 08-May-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  35. 07-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 03-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Modasa recorded a compromise between petitioner Mehulbhai Ninama and New India Insurance Co. Ltd., awarding compensation of Rs. 3 lakh. The tribunal directed 50% to be invested as a fixed deposit for five years and 50% paid immediately via cheque/RTGS, with the insurance company depositing funds into the tribunal's designated bank account per Supreme Court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case