THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DIPAKBHAI ALIAS DIPLO ARVINDBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A M CHAUHAN — 2/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJAR010002192026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-Addl.district And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

767

Police Station

BAYAD POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6,8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. D S PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIPAKBHAI ALIAS DIPLO ARVINDBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A M CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of POKSO Case No. 02/2026 (Gujarat) Court Decision: The defendant Dipakbhai Arvindbhai Parmar was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4,6,8,12. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish that the alleged victim was a minor at the time of the incident, and could not prove non-consensual conduct or abduction. Medical and victim testimony revealed consensual relations between the accused and the 18-year-old victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Copies To Accused

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of POKSO Case No. 02/2026 (Gujarat) Court Decision: The defendant Dipakbhai Arvindbhai Parmar was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4,6,8,12. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish that the alleged victim was a minor at the time of the incident, and could not prove non-consensual conduct or abduction. Medical and victim testimony revealed consensual relations between the accused and the 18-year-old victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case