THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL — 4/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAR010000062026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

01-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-Addl.district And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

561

Police Station

MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. T K RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Case 4/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, is acquitted and discharged of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution failed to establish the stolen mobile phone's recovery directly from the accused or provide credible witness testimony linking the accused to the crime. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution's case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and witness statements that contained contradictions and lacked corroboration. Critical gaps included inability to definitively identify who stole the mobile phone, weak chain of custody for recovered evidence, and witnesses' admissions of darkness/inability to identify the actual perpetrator during the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case 4/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, is acquitted and discharged of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution failed to establish the stolen mobile phone's recovery directly from the accused or provide credible witness testimony linking the accused to the crime. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution's case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and witness statements that contained contradictions and lacked corroboration. Critical gaps included inability to definitively identify who stole the mobile phone, weak chain of custody for recovered evidence, and witnesses' admissions of darkness/inability to identify the actual perpetrator during the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case