THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL — 3/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJAR010000052026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
01-01-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
560
Police Station
MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J S DESAI
Respondent(s)
AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient credible evidence to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused stole a mobile phone worth Rs. 18,000 from the complainant's son during the alleged incident on August 20, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the prosecution's witnesses were inconsistent and unable to reliably identify the accused; the seizure of the allegedly stolen mobile phone lacked proper documentation and chain of custody; and the investigating officer's report contained procedural deficiencies. Additionally, the court found that the victim's statement regarding identification was unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient credible evidence to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused stole a mobile phone worth Rs. 18,000 from the complainant's son during the alleged incident on August 20, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the prosecution's witnesses were inconsistent and unable to reliably identify the accused; the seizure of the allegedly stolen mobile phone lacked proper documentation and chain of custody; and the investigating officer's report contained procedural deficiencies. Additionally, the court found that the victim's statement regarding identification was unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts