THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL — 3/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAR010000052026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

01-01-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

01-01-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

560

Police Station

MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 379(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. J S DESAI

Respondent(s)

AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

10-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient credible evidence to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused stole a mobile phone worth Rs. 18,000 from the complainant's son during the alleged incident on August 20, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the prosecution's witnesses were inconsistent and unable to reliably identify the accused; the seizure of the allegedly stolen mobile phone lacked proper documentation and chain of custody; and the investigating officer's report contained procedural deficiencies. Additionally, the court found that the victim's statement regarding identification was unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient credible evidence to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused stole a mobile phone worth Rs. 18,000 from the complainant's son during the alleged incident on August 20, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the prosecution's witnesses were inconsistent and unable to reliably identify the accused; the seizure of the allegedly stolen mobile phone lacked proper documentation and chain of custody; and the investigating officer's report contained procedural deficiencies. Additionally, the court found that the victim's statement regarding identification was unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case