THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL — 3/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAR010000052026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

01-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-Addl.district And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

560

Police Station

MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. J S DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - G M PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient credible evidence to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused stole a mobile phone worth Rs. 18,000 from the complainant's son during the alleged incident on August 20, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the prosecution's witnesses were inconsistent and unable to reliably identify the accused; the seizure of the allegedly stolen mobile phone lacked proper documentation and chain of custody; and the investigating officer's report contained procedural deficiencies. Additionally, the court found that the victim's statement regarding identification was unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient credible evidence to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused stole a mobile phone worth Rs. 18,000 from the complainant's son during the alleged incident on August 20, 2023. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the prosecution's witnesses were inconsistent and unable to reliably identify the accused; the seizure of the allegedly stolen mobile phone lacked proper documentation and chain of custody; and the investigating officer's report contained procedural deficiencies. Additionally, the court found that the victim's statement regarding identification was unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case