THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH — 2/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJAR010000042026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
01-Jan-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
01-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-Addl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
562
Police Station
MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J D PANCHAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Decision (10/04/2026): The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a). The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible witness identification and insufficient evidence connecting the accused to the alleged mobile phone theft. The court found the prosecution's case inherently deficient and ordered the accused's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2026
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Decision (10/04/2026): The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a). The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible witness identification and insufficient evidence connecting the accused to the alleged mobile phone theft. The court found the prosecution's case inherently deficient and ordered the accused's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts