THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH — 2/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJAR010000042026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
01-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
562
Police Station
MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J D PANCHAL
Respondent(s)
AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Decision (10/04/2026): The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a). The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible witness identification and insufficient evidence connecting the accused to the alleged mobile phone theft. The court found the prosecution's case inherently deficient and ordered the accused's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan Decision (10/04/2026): The court acquitted the accused, Ayan Anishmiya Pathan, of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a). The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible witness identification and insufficient evidence connecting the accused to the alleged mobile phone theft. The court found the prosecution's case inherently deficient and ordered the accused's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts