THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH — 1/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJAR010000032026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
01-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
563
Police Station
MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. V A PANDYA
Respondent(s)
AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 1/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan The Gujarat trial court acquitted the accused Ayan Anishmiya Pathan of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient evidence that the accused stole a Vivo mobile phone worth Rs. 12,000 from a police constable. The court determined that while the prosecution established the mobile phone went missing during an alleged incident on January 21, 2023, it failed to conclusively prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to gaps in witness testimonies, inconsistent details in the five eyewitnesses' statements, and lack of direct recovery of the stolen phone from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 1/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan The Gujarat trial court acquitted the accused Ayan Anishmiya Pathan of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient evidence that the accused stole a Vivo mobile phone worth Rs. 12,000 from a police constable. The court determined that while the prosecution established the mobile phone went missing during an alleged incident on January 21, 2023, it failed to conclusively prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to gaps in witness testimonies, inconsistent details in the five eyewitnesses' statements, and lack of direct recovery of the stolen phone from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts