THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH — 1/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAR010000032026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

01-01-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

01-01-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

563

Police Station

MODASA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 379(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. V A PANDYA

Respondent(s)

AYAN ANISHMIYA PATHAN Advocate - A A SHAIKH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

10-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Case 1/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan The Gujarat trial court acquitted the accused Ayan Anishmiya Pathan of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient evidence that the accused stole a Vivo mobile phone worth Rs. 12,000 from a police constable. The court determined that while the prosecution established the mobile phone went missing during an alleged incident on January 21, 2023, it failed to conclusively prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to gaps in witness testimonies, inconsistent details in the five eyewitnesses' statements, and lack of direct recovery of the stolen phone from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Ayan Anishmiya Pathan The Gujarat trial court acquitted the accused Ayan Anishmiya Pathan of theft charges under IPC Section 379(a), finding insufficient evidence that the accused stole a Vivo mobile phone worth Rs. 12,000 from a police constable. The court determined that while the prosecution established the mobile phone went missing during an alleged incident on January 21, 2023, it failed to conclusively prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to gaps in witness testimonies, inconsistent details in the five eyewitnesses' statements, and lack of direct recovery of the stolen phone from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case