Government of Gujarat vs MINABEN W/O GOVINDBHAI PUNAMBHAI TALPADA — 2439/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030032242025
Filing Number
2439/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
2439/2025
Registration Date
17-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0395
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MINABEN W/O GOVINDBHAI PUNAMBHAI TALPADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the respondent Minaben of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence of "exclusive and conscious possession" of contraband alcohol. The court held that key prosecution witnesses failed to support the case adequately, and in the absence of credible corroborating evidence, conviction beyond reasonable doubt could not be established, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2439/2025
The court acquitted the respondent Minaben of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence of "exclusive and conscious possession" of contraband alcohol. The court held that key prosecution witnesses failed to support the case adequately, and in the absence of credible corroborating evidence, conviction beyond reasonable doubt could not be established, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts