Government of Gujarat vs DHANIBEN W/O RAMANBHAI MANIBHAI TALPADA — 2435/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030032202025
Filing Number
2435/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
2435/2025
Registration Date
17-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0487
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHANIBEN W/O RAMANBHAI MANIBHAI TALPADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the defendant Dhaniben W/O Ramanbhai Manibhai Talpada of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged possession and sale of liquor, finding insufficient evidence and lack of credible witness testimony to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that key witnesses failed to adequately support the prosecution's case, and the procedural defects in investigation and evidence collection warranted acquittal rather than conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2435/2025
The court acquitted the defendant Dhaniben W/O Ramanbhai Manibhai Talpada of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged possession and sale of liquor, finding insufficient evidence and lack of credible witness testimony to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that key witnesses failed to adequately support the prosecution's case, and the procedural defects in investigation and evidence collection warranted acquittal rather than conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts