Government of Gujarat vs AMBABEN W/O MANUBHAI KACHARABHAI TALPADA — 2369/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030031232025
Filing Number
2369/2025
Filing Date
04-Nov-2025
Registration No
2369/2025
Registration Date
04-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0458
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMBABEN W/O MANUBHAI KACHARABHAI TALPADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the respondent Ambaben W/O Manubhai Kacharabhai Talpada of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately support the charges, and the accused's exclusive and conscious possession of the alleged contraband could not be established, warranting acquittal on all counts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2369/2025
The court acquitted the respondent Ambaben W/O Manubhai Kacharabhai Talpada of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately support the charges, and the accused's exclusive and conscious possession of the alleged contraband could not be established, warranting acquittal on all counts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts