Government of Gujarat vs JASHODABEN W/O ASHOKBHAI FAKIRBHAI TALPADA — 2368/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAN030031222025

Filing Number

2368/2025

Filing Date

04-Nov-2025

Registration No

2368/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PETLAD

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0454

Police Station

PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.JASHODABEN W/O ASHOKBHAI FAKIRBHAI TALPADA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
18-Apr-2026

Judegement

Case Summary: C.C.NO.2368/2025 The court acquitted the respondent Jashodaben of charges under Gujarat NDPS Act Section 65(a)(a) for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illicit alcohol valued at ₹400. The court found insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession and noted that key prosecution witnesses failed to support the case, making conviction impossible beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
30-Mar-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
17-Mar-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
18-Feb-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
07-Jan-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
01-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
04-Nov-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 2368/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.NO.2368/2025 The court acquitted the respondent Jashodaben of charges under Gujarat NDPS Act Section 65(a)(a) for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illicit alcohol valued at ₹400. The court found insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession and noted that key prosecution witnesses failed to support the case, making conviction impossible beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.