Government of Gujarat vs SAMUBEN W/O SHANKARBHAI HIRABHAI TALPADA — 2364/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030031182025
Filing Number
2364/2025
Filing Date
04-Nov-2025
Registration No
2364/2025
Registration Date
04-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0437
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAMUBEN W/O SHANKARBHAI HIRABHAI TALPADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Samuben W/O Shankarbhai Hirabhai Talpada (2364/2025) The court acquitted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. Key witnesses, particularly the five panchas (neutral observers), failed to adequately support the case, and critical procedural irregularities undermined the integrity of the investigation, warranting acquittal based on the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
23-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2364/2025
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Samuben W/O Shankarbhai Hirabhai Talpada (2364/2025) The court acquitted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. Key witnesses, particularly the five panchas (neutral observers), failed to adequately support the case, and critical procedural irregularities undermined the integrity of the investigation, warranting acquittal based on the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts