PINAL P PATEL PARTNER OF K K ENTERPRISE vs SHAH RAJENDRAKUMAR VASANTBHAI Advocate - P M MAHAVAR — 1890/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030025122025
Filing Number
1890/2025
Filing Date
22-Aug-2025
Registration No
1890/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PINAL P PATEL PARTNER OF K K ENTERPRISE
Adv. M A DIWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAH RAJENDRAKUMAR VASANTBHAI Advocate - P M MAHAVAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the complaint filed by petitioner Pinal P Patel (K K Enterprise partner) against respondent Shah Rajendrakumar Vasantbhai on 21/04/2026. The dismissal was ordered because the petitioner did not wish to proceed further with the complaint, as evidenced by the withdrawal application submitted during the Lok Adalat proceedings at Patlad court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Apr-2026
Restored
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2026
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
02-Dec-2025
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
04-Nov-2025
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1890/2025
The court dismissed the complaint filed by petitioner Pinal P Patel (K K Enterprise partner) against respondent Shah Rajendrakumar Vasantbhai on 21/04/2026. The dismissal was ordered because the petitioner did not wish to proceed further with the complaint, as evidenced by the withdrawal application submitted during the Lok Adalat proceedings at Patlad court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts