Government of Gujarat vs RADHABEN WIFE/O SURYKANTBHAI SOMBHAI GULABBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED — 1883/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030025042025
Filing Number
1883/2025
Filing Date
22-Aug-2025
Registration No
1883/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0225
Police Station
PETLAD RURAL POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RADHABEN WIFE/O SURYKANTBHAI SOMBHAI GULABBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 1883/2025 The court acquitted the respondent (Radhaben) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(5) for allegedly possessing 10 liters of illicit liquor. The court found that key prosecution witnesses failed to provide credible corroboration, the seizure procedure was questionable, and the prosecution could not establish exclusive conscious possession beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that valuable court time should not be wasted on trials lacking conviction prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
02-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1883/2025
Summary of Case 1883/2025 The court acquitted the respondent (Radhaben) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(5) for allegedly possessing 10 liters of illicit liquor. The court found that key prosecution witnesses failed to provide credible corroboration, the seizure procedure was questionable, and the prosecution could not establish exclusive conscious possession beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that valuable court time should not be wasted on trials lacking conviction prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts