Government of Gujarat vs MINABEN W/O KALPESHBHAI RAMANBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED — 1821/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030024332025
Filing Number
1821/2025
Filing Date
20-Aug-2025
Registration No
1821/2025
Registration Date
20-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0268
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MINABEN W/O KALPESHBHAI RAMANBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(5), finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession of contraband alcohol. The court noted critical witnesses failed to support the charge sheet, and procedural deficiencies undermined the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt, necessitating acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
28-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1821/2025
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(5), finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession of contraband alcohol. The court noted critical witnesses failed to support the charge sheet, and procedural deficiencies undermined the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt, necessitating acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts