Government of Gujarat vs BHAGIBEN WIFE/O KANUBHAI FAKIRBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED — 1659/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(AA). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030022502025
Filing Number
1659/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
1659/2025
Registration Date
06-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0235
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAGIBEN WIFE/O KANUBHAI FAKIRBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the respondent, Bhagiben, of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged possession of illicit liquor, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession and lack of credible witness support for the prosecution's case. The court ruled that key prosecution witnesses failed to substantiate the charge beyond reasonable doubt, and ordered the destruction of seized materials while directing the respondent's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
28-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1659/2025
The court acquitted the respondent, Bhagiben, of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged possession of illicit liquor, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession and lack of credible witness support for the prosecution's case. The court ruled that key prosecution witnesses failed to substantiate the charge beyond reasonable doubt, and ordered the destruction of seized materials while directing the respondent's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts