Government of Gujarat vs HITESHKUMAR KANTIBHAI THAKOR Advocate - I A SAIYED — 1279/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(AA),116(B),81,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030020742024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1279/2024
Filing Date
03-06-2024
Registration No
1279/2024
Registration Date
03-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HITESHKUMAR KANTIBHAI THAKOR Advocate - I A SAIYED
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 06-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 65(a)(a), 116(b), and 81 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of possessing foreign liquor (McDowell's No-1 Whisky) beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish exclusive and conscious possession of the contraband and that critical witnesses' testimonies were not reliably corroborated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 65(a)(a), 116(b), and 81 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of possessing foreign liquor (McDowell's No-1 Whisky) beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish exclusive and conscious possession of the contraband and that critical witnesses' testimonies were not reliably corroborated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts