Government of Gujarat vs MINABEN WIFE/O KISHMATKUMAR NARANBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED — 1229/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(AA). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030017132025
Filing Number
1229/2025
Filing Date
26-Jun-2025
Registration No
1229/2025
Registration Date
26-Jun-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0078
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MINABEN WIFE/O KISHMATKUMAR NARANBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: C.C.NO.1229-2025 The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. Critical witnesses failed to corroborate the prosecution's case, and key evidentiary gaps prevented proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no proper foundation for conviction and declined to waste judicial time on a trial with no prospect of conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
02-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1229/2025
Case Summary: C.C.NO.1229-2025 The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. Critical witnesses failed to corroborate the prosecution's case, and key evidentiary gaps prevented proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no proper foundation for conviction and declined to waste judicial time on a trial with no prospect of conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts