Government of Gujarat vs GITABEN W/O ARVINDBHAI RAMANBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED — 1210/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030016812025
Filing Number
1210/2025
Filing Date
20-Jun-2025
Registration No
1210/2025
Registration Date
20-Jun-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0230
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GITABEN W/O ARVINDBHAI RAMANBHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 65) for allegedly possessing and selling alcohol, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key witnesses failed to adequately support the prosecution's case, and the seizure procedures lacked proper corroboration, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
02-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1210/2025
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 65) for allegedly possessing and selling alcohol, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key witnesses failed to adequately support the prosecution's case, and the seizure procedures lacked proper corroboration, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts