Government of Gujarat vs LAXMIBEN WIFE/O RAJUBHAI DAHYABHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED — 981/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(AA). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAN030013292025

Filing Number

981/2025

Filing Date

25-Apr-2025

Registration No

981/2025

Registration Date

25-Apr-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PETLAD

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0065

Police Station

PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(AA)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMIBEN WIFE/O RAJUBHAI DAHYABHAI TALPADA Advocate - P J SAIYED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession of illegal alcohol. The court held that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately support the case, and applying the principle that courts should not waste time on trials with no prospect of conviction, ordered the accused's acquittal and destruction of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  12. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  13. 26-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 25-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 981/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession of illegal alcohol. The court held that key prosecution witnesses failed to adequately support the case, and applying the principle that courts should not waste time on trials with no prospect of conviction, ordered the accused's acquittal and destruction of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case