Government of Gujarat vs SURIBEN URFE SURAJBEN WIFE/O VINODBHAI JAYRAMBHAI TALPADA Advocate - N B MALI — 288/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(AA). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030004852025
Filing Number
288/2025
Filing Date
03-Mar-2025
Registration No
288/2025
Registration Date
03-Mar-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0029
Police Station
PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURIBEN URFE SURAJBEN WIFE/O VINODBHAI JAYRAMBHAI TALPADA Advocate - N B MALI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses (the five panchas) did not support the police narrative regarding alleged plastic bottles containing contraband liquor seized from the accused's possession. The court found that exclusive and conscious possession of the seized items could not be conclusively proven against the accused, and therefore acquitted him and ordered destruction of the seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 288/2025
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses (the five panchas) did not support the police narrative regarding alleged plastic bottles containing contraband liquor seized from the accused's possession. The court found that exclusive and conscious possession of the seized items could not be conclusively proven against the accused, and therefore acquitted him and ordered destruction of the seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts