DEVENDRASINH BHAGVANSINH MAHIDA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD vs RAJESHKUMAR POPATBHAI BHARVAD — 159/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030002512025
Filing Number
159/2025
Filing Date
29-Jan-2025
Registration No
159/2025
Registration Date
29-Jan-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 22-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVENDRASINH BHAGVANSINH MAHIDA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD
Adv. M S BAROT
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESHKUMAR POPATBHAI BHARVAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court (CC No.159-2025, Patiala) dismissed the defendant's application under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the cheque transaction valid. The court ordered the defendant to pay the cheque amount as demanded by the plaintiff, rejecting the defendant's defense that the cheque was issued without proper consideration or authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
06-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 159/2025
The court (CC No.159-2025, Patiala) dismissed the defendant's application under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the cheque transaction valid. The court ordered the defendant to pay the cheque amount as demanded by the plaintiff, rejecting the defendant's defense that the cheque was issued without proper consideration or authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts