Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI @ SALIM @ CHAMADI — 152/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,114,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAN030002422025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
152/2025
Filing Date
28-01-2025
Registration No
152/2025
Registration Date
28-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PETLAD
Judge
2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIJAYBHAI @ SALIM @ CHAMADI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 04-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 17-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-10-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decided to acquit the accused under CrPC Section 320(1)(2), holding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court established that compounding of offenses under CrPC Section 320 is a unilateral right of the victim/complainant and the accused's presence is not mandatory for such compounding; consequently, the prosecution's case was accepted and recorded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court decided to acquit the accused under CrPC Section 320(1)(2), holding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court established that compounding of offenses under CrPC Section 320 is a unilateral right of the victim/complainant and the accused's presence is not mandatory for such compounding; consequently, the prosecution's case was accepted and recorded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts