ADDMINISTRATOR OF INDIA QUORY WORKS DINDARBHAI SADARUDINBHAI VISANI vs KALUBHAI RAJSIBHAI SINDHAV — 646/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAM110009672024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
646/2024
Filing Date
30-12-2024
Registration No
646/2024
Registration Date
30-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BAGASARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADDMINISTRATOR OF INDIA QUORY WORKS DINDARBHAI SADARUDINBHAI VISANI
Adv. A M MEHTA
Respondent(s)
KALUBHAI RAJSIBHAI SINDHAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-02-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 19-02-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 17-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused, Kalubbhai Rajshhibhai Sindh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (₹3,00,000) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had provided goods on credit and received the cheque as payment security, but the cheque was dishonored. Finding the complainant's evidence credible and the accused's failure to rebut the statutory presumption, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹1,93,000 as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused, Kalubbhai Rajshhibhai Sindh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (₹3,00,000) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had provided goods on credit and received the cheque as payment security, but the cheque was dishonored. Finding the complainant's evidence credible and the accused's failure to rebut the statutory presumption, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹1,93,000 as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts