ADDMINISTRATOR OF INDIA QUORY WORKS DINDARBHAI SADARUDINBHAI VISANI vs KALUBHAI RAJSIBHAI SINDHAV — 646/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 15th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAM110009672024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

646/2024

Filing Date

30-12-2024

Registration No

646/2024

Registration Date

30-12-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BAGASARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,142,

Petitioner(s)

ADDMINISTRATOR OF INDIA QUORY WORKS DINDARBHAI SADARUDINBHAI VISANI

Adv. A M MEHTA

Respondent(s)

KALUBHAI RAJSIBHAI SINDHAV

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

15-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

27-02-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

19-02-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

17-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court convicted the accused, Kalubbhai Rajshhibhai Sindh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (₹3,00,000) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had provided goods on credit and received the cheque as payment security, but the cheque was dishonored. Finding the complainant's evidence credible and the accused's failure to rebut the statutory presumption, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹1,93,000 as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused, Kalubbhai Rajshhibhai Sindh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (₹3,00,000) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had provided goods on credit and received the cheque as payment security, but the cheque was dishonored. Finding the complainant's evidence credible and the accused's failure to rebut the statutory presumption, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹1,93,000 as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BAGASARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case