GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NIKUNJ CHAGANBHAI GAJERA Advocate - V V THAKAR — 159/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 85,115(2),351(3),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAM110002262025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
159/2025
Filing Date
19-02-2025
Registration No
159/2025
Registration Date
19-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BAGASARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1119300925002
Police Station
BAGASARA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NIKUNJ CHAGANBHAI GAJERA Advocate - V V THAKAR
BHANUBEN CHAGANBHAI RAVJIBHAI GAJERA
CHAGANBHAI RAVJIBHAI GAJERA
HIRALBEN CHAGANBHAI RAVJIBHAI GAJERA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 01-04-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Bagasara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all four accused persons on April 18, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges under Indian Penal Code sections 498-A (cruelty to married woman), 113-B (dowry death), 351-3 (criminal intimidation), and 54 (attempt to commit offense), and Dowry Prohibition Act Section 4. The complainant failed to substantiate beyond reasonable doubt that the accused subjected her to harassment, demanded illegal dowry, or made death threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bagasara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all four accused persons on April 18, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges under Indian Penal Code sections 498-A (cruelty to married woman), 113-B (dowry death), 351-3 (criminal intimidation), and 54 (attempt to commit offense), and Dowry Prohibition Act Section 4. The complainant failed to substantiate beyond reasonable doubt that the accused subjected her to harassment, demanded illegal dowry, or made death threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts