Government of Gujarat vs CHETANSINH DAVSINH RAWAT Advocate - P A KHACHAR — 463/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304(A),279,337,338,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAM080009162024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

463/2024

Filing Date

19-11-2024

Registration No

463/2024

Registration Date

19-11-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BABRA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193008240166

Police Station

BABRA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 304(A),279,337,338,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 134,177,184,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

CHETANSINH DAVSINH RAWAT Advocate - P A KHACHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

09-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Chetsingh Devsingh Rawat, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite evidence of a fatal accident involving a truck on March 18, 2024, the court determined that the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused was the truck driver or that he operated the vehicle recklessly, as no independent witness could reliably identify the accused or the vehicle's speed. The court emphasized that while one witness provided testimony, corroborating evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction under IPC sections 304(a), 279, 337, 338, and MV Act sections 134, 177, 184. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Chetsingh Devsingh Rawat, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite evidence of a fatal accident involving a truck on March 18, 2024, the court determined that the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused was the truck driver or that he operated the vehicle recklessly, as no independent witness could reliably identify the accused or the vehicle's speed. The court emphasized that while one witness provided testimony, corroborating evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction under IPC sections 304(a), 279, 337, 338, and MV Act sections 134, 177, 184. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BABRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case