KALYANSINH MANOHARSINH SISODIYA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 45/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAM080001142026

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BABRA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193008260104

Police Station

BABRA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALYANSINH MANOHARSINH SISODIYA

    Adv. N P VASANI

  2. 2.NARESHBHAI KISHANLAL SAHU

    Adv. N P VASANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    These Gujarati court judgments relate to bail and land release petitions under the Prohibition Act. The courts consistently held that accused persons charged with large-quantity smuggling of foreign liquor should not be released on bail, as the crimes involved intentional criminal conduct, substantial contraband seizures, and posed risks to public order and law enforcement effectiveness. The courts ordered that accused persons remain in custody pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

These Gujarati court judgments relate to bail and land release petitions under the Prohibition Act. The courts consistently held that accused persons charged with large-quantity smuggling of foreign liquor should not be released on bail, as the crimes involved intentional criminal conduct, substantial contraband seizures, and posed risks to public order and law enforcement effectiveness. The courts ordered that accused persons remain in custody pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case