JAYDIP ALIAS GOPAL HARSHADBHAI LASHKARI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 44/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAM080001132026

Filing Number

44/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

44/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BABRA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193008250522

Police Station

BABRA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYDIP ALIAS GOPAL HARSHADBHAI LASHKARI

    Adv. B B RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the accused's bail plea, finding prima facie evidence of serious fraud involving unauthorized bank transactions worth ₹24,80,000 and forged documents. The court held that filing of a charge-sheet does not diminish the prosecution's allegations and that the accused poses a flight risk given the severity of the offenses, thereby denying bail and ordering the accused to remain in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the accused's bail plea, finding prima facie evidence of serious fraud involving unauthorized bank transactions worth ₹24,80,000 and forged documents. The court held that filing of a charge-sheet does not diminish the prosecution's allegations and that the accused poses a flight risk given the severity of the offenses, thereby denying bail and ordering the accused to remain in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case