GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs GOVINDBHAI JIVABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B RATHOD — 369/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAM070004862025
Filing Number
369/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
369/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KUNKAVAV VADIA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1119060250299
Police Station
VADIA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVINDBHAI JIVABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence that the accused was in possession of illicit liquor for sale. The prosecution's case relied solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, credible witnesses, or proper forensic reports, making the allegations questionable and legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 369/2025
Summary The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence that the accused was in possession of illicit liquor for sale. The prosecution's case relied solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, credible witnesses, or proper forensic reports, making the allegations questionable and legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts