Government of Gujarat vs BHAVESHBHAI NARANBHAI BARAIYA — 12/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAM060000502026

Filing Number

12/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAFRABAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193040250284

Police Station

NAGESHRI POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESHBHAI NARANBHAI BARAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Ahmedabad Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Pollution Control Act 2017, finding him guilty of improper waste disposal. The court sentenced him to imprisonment up to court period and a fine of Rs. 100, with an additional 5-day imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his impoverished background and first-time offense while upholding justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Ahmedabad Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Pollution Control Act 2017, finding him guilty of improper waste disposal. The court sentenced him to imprisonment up to court period and a fine of Rs. 100, with an additional 5-day imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his impoverished background and first-time offense while upholding justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case