Government of Gujarat vs SANDIPBHAI RAMESHBHAI SHARMA Advocate - G S SAMMA — 1239/2023
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAM040015452023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1239/2023
Filing Date
01-12-2023
Registration No
1239/2023
Registration Date
01-12-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHAMBHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11193027220152
Police Station
KHAMBHA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANDIPBHAI RAMESHBHAI SHARMA Advocate - G S SAMMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 20-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 21-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Sandipbhai Rameshbhai Sharma of charges under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the blood sample collection procedure did not strictly comply with Rule 4 of the Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, as the sample was not forwarded to the testing officer within the mandatory seven days, thereby compromising the reliability of the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Sandipbhai Rameshbhai Sharma of charges under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the blood sample collection procedure did not strictly comply with Rule 4 of the Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, as the sample was not forwarded to the testing officer within the mandatory seven days, thereby compromising the reliability of the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts