Government of Gujarat vs RAMBHAI SAMATBHAI KANSAGRA Advocate - D S SANKHAT — 35/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAM040001192026

Filing Number

35/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHAMBHA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193027250433

Police Station

KHAMBHA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMBHAI SAMATBHAI KANSAGRA Advocate - D S SANKHAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing and consuming alcohol without a permit in a public place. Considering the accused's plea of guilt, confession, impoverished socio-economic background, and commitment to abstain from future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if unpaid) instead of the statutory minimum, relying on established precedent that "special and adequate reasons" peculiar to each accused must be recorded in writing to justify reduced sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing and consuming alcohol without a permit in a public place. Considering the accused's plea of guilt, confession, impoverished socio-economic background, and commitment to abstain from future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if unpaid) instead of the statutory minimum, relying on established precedent that "special and adequate reasons" peculiar to each accused must be recorded in writing to justify reduced sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case