Government of Gujarat vs BHUPATBHAI JAGUBHAI VALA Advocate - S S JAM — 710/2024
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAM030011452024
Filing Number
710/2024
Filing Date
01-Oct-2024
Registration No
710/2024
Registration Date
01-Oct-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHARI
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11193018240416
Police Station
DHARI POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHUPATBHAI JAGUBHAI VALA Advocate - S S JAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Dhari acquitted the accused, Bhuptbhai Jugubhai Vala, of the theft charge under IPC Section 303(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's witnesses—including the panchas (notaries) who recorded the recovery of the motorcycle—did not corroborate the complaint's allegations. The court ruled that mere recovery of the vehicle from the accused without conclusive evidence of theft was insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-May-2025
Copies To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 710/2024
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Dhari acquitted the accused, Bhuptbhai Jugubhai Vala, of the theft charge under IPC Section 303(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's witnesses—including the panchas (notaries) who recorded the recovery of the motorcycle—did not corroborate the complaint's allegations. The court ruled that mere recovery of the vehicle from the accused without conclusive evidence of theft was insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts