Government of Gujarat vs AMITBHAI VIJAYBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A M VALA — 688/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),329(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 17th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAM030011042024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

688/2024

Filing Date

17-09-2024

Registration No

688/2024

Registration Date

17-09-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHARI

Judge

2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193013240159

Police Station

CHALALA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 303(2),329(3)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AMITBHAI VIJAYBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A M VALA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

10-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhari acquitted the accused Amitbhai Vijaybhai Solanki of theft charges under IPC Sections 303(2) and 329(3), finding insufficient evidence to prove the complainant's allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, the evidence presented failed to conclusively establish that the accused stole a tractor battery, ordering his immediate release with bail conditions of ₹15,000 bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhari acquitted the accused Amitbhai Vijaybhai Solanki of theft charges under IPC Sections 303(2) and 329(3), finding insufficient evidence to prove the complainant's allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, the evidence presented failed to conclusively establish that the accused stole a tractor battery, ordering his immediate release with bail conditions of ₹15,000 bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHARI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case