VIJAY @ KADAR HIMMATBHAI MAKWANA vs Government of Gujarat — 30/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAM030002782026

Filing Number

30/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHARI

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193013250201

Police Station

CHALALA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY @ KADAR HIMMATBHAI MAKWANA

    Adv. S B BHAGAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhari granted bail to the accused Vijay (alias Kadar) Makwana in a theft case (FIR No. 11193013250201/2025) under IPC sections 331(3), 331(4), and 305(a). The court found the accused had been in judicial custody since 01/12/2025 and, considering the seriousness of the crime, the strength of evidence, likelihood of trial attendance, risk of evidence tampering, and possibility of re-offending, decided bail was appropriate with strict conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and maintaining regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhari granted bail to the accused Vijay (alias Kadar) Makwana in a theft case (FIR No. 11193013250201/2025) under IPC sections 331(3), 331(4), and 305(a). The court found the accused had been in judicial custody since 01/12/2025 and, considering the seriousness of the crime, the strength of evidence, likelihood of trial attendance, risk of evidence tampering, and possibility of re-offending, decided bail was appropriate with strict conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and maintaining regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case