VIJAY @ KADAR HIMMATBHAI MAKWANA vs Government of Gujarat — 30/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJAM030002782026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
30/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
30/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHARI
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11193013250201
Police Station
CHALALA POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAY @ KADAR HIMMATBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. S B BHAGAT
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhari granted bail to the accused Vijay (alias Kadar) Makwana in a theft case (FIR No. 11193013250201/2025) under IPC sections 331(3), 331(4), and 305(a). The court found the accused had been in judicial custody since 01/12/2025 and, considering the seriousness of the crime, the strength of evidence, likelihood of trial attendance, risk of evidence tampering, and possibility of re-offending, decided bail was appropriate with strict conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and maintaining regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhari granted bail to the accused Vijay (alias Kadar) Makwana in a theft case (FIR No. 11193013250201/2025) under IPC sections 331(3), 331(4), and 305(a). The court found the accused had been in judicial custody since 01/12/2025 and, considering the seriousness of the crime, the strength of evidence, likelihood of trial attendance, risk of evidence tampering, and possibility of re-offending, decided bail was appropriate with strict conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and maintaining regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts