Government of Gujarat vs NITINBHAI MUKESHBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - R N JOSHI — 85/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,504,506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAM030001252025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
85/2025
Filing Date
30-01-2025
Registration No
85/2025
Registration Date
30-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHARI
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11193018240461
Police Station
DHARI POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NITINBHAI MUKESHBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - R N JOSHI
SHARDABEN MUKESHBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. R N JOSHI
BIPINBHAI MUKESHBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. R N JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 17-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dharampur acquitted all three defendants (Nitinbhai Mukeshbhai Makwana, Sharadaben Mukeshbhai Makwana, and Bipinbhai Mukeshbhai Makwana) of charges under IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 on March 20, 2026. The court found that the complainant's testimony during cross-examination contradicted her own case, failing to establish the alleged domestic cruelty and harassment claims beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dharampur acquitted all three defendants (Nitinbhai Mukeshbhai Makwana, Sharadaben Mukeshbhai Makwana, and Bipinbhai Mukeshbhai Makwana) of charges under IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 on March 20, 2026. The court found that the complainant's testimony during cross-examination contradicted her own case, failing to establish the alleged domestic cruelty and harassment claims beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts