CHINMAY FINLEASE LIMITED vs Nabin Bhattacharjee — 9131/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Act 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

eCC - eCRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH280090432025

e-Filing Number

25-12-2025

Filing Number

7451/2025

Filing Date

26-Dec-2025

Registration No

9131/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2025

Court

SARAS N.I. Courts, CJM, Ahmedabad City

Judge

2-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINMAY FINLEASE LIMITED

    Adv. MR SHAH SWAPNIL PRAVIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nabin Bhattacharjee

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court accepted the complainant's voluntary withdrawal of the case filed under Section 25 of the Payment & Settlement Systems Act, 2007, after the accused discharged their liability through an electronic fund transfer to the complainant's satisfaction. The accused was acquitted of all charges, and no costs were imposed, with the court noting that discouraging settlements during Lok Adalat would be counterproductive to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9131/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court accepted the complainant's voluntary withdrawal of the case filed under Section 25 of the Payment & Settlement Systems Act, 2007, after the accused discharged their liability through an electronic fund transfer to the complainant's satisfaction. The accused was acquitted of all charges, and no costs were imposed, with the court noting that discouraging settlements during Lok Adalat would be counterproductive to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case