CHINMAY FINLEASE LIMITED vs Sushmita Roy — 7380/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Act 2007 Section 25. Status: Process To Accused. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Process To Accused Next hearing 01-Jul-2026 this date has passed

eCC - eCRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH280076182025

e-Filing Number

15-09-2025

Filing Number

6129/2025

Filing Date

17-Sep-2025

Registration No

7380/2025

Registration Date

17-Sep-2025

Court

SARAS N.I. Courts, CJM, Ahmedabad City

Judge

2-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINMAY FINLEASE LIMITED

    Adv. MR SHAH SWAPNIL PRAVIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sushmita Roy

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court directed the preparation of a warrant against the accused within the next working day and ordered the complainant to obtain and transmit it to the concerned police station immediately. The officer-in-charge is held personally responsible for timely warrant execution, with complainant authorized to file a Section 198 BNS 2023 complaint against police for non-execution or delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  6. 12-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  7. 22-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7380/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court directed the preparation of a warrant against the accused within the next working day and ordered the complainant to obtain and transmit it to the concerned police station immediately. The officer-in-charge is held personally responsible for timely warrant execution, with complainant authorized to file a Section 198 BNS 2023 complaint against police for non-execution or delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case