HDB Financial Services Ltd vs MANISH HEMATLAL RUPAPARA Advocate - R V MAKWANA — 1775/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Act 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

eCC - eCRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH280022572025

e-Filing Number

22-02-2025

Filing Number

754/2025

Filing Date

12-Mar-2025

Registration No

1775/2025

Registration Date

13-Mar-2025

Court

SARAS N.I. Courts, CJM, Ahmedabad City

Judge

2-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB Financial Services Ltd

    Adv. MR ABICHANDANI CHINTAN RAMESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISH HEMATLAL RUPAPARA Advocate - R V MAKWANA

  2. 2.DHARMISHTHA MANISHBHAI RUPAPARA--DELETED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Manish Hematlal Rupapara, under Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, for dishonoring an Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) of ₹3,14,199 initiated by the complainant's financial services company. The court found that the accused received the loan amount but failed to honor the EFT commitment within 15 days of receiving the statutory demand notice, thereby committing fraud in electronic financial transactions. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay a fine of ₹3,45,619 as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  13. 28-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  14. 10-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  15. 21-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 2. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  16. 15-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 12-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1775/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Manish Hematlal Rupapara, under Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, for dishonoring an Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) of ₹3,14,199 initiated by the complainant's financial services company. The court found that the accused received the loan amount but failed to honor the EFT commitment within 15 days of receiving the statutory demand notice, thereby committing fraud in electronic financial transactions. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay a fine of ₹3,45,619 as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case