TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED vs DILIP D RAIYANI Advocate - H R JADAV — 204/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

eCC - eCRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH280002152025

e-Filing Number

09-01-2025

Filing Number

199/2025

Filing Date

09-Jan-2025

Registration No

204/2025

Registration Date

10-Jan-2025

Court

SARAS N.I. Courts, CJM, Ahmedabad City

Judge

1-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. MR VAGHELA DEVDATTSINH DILAVARSINH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILIP D RAIYANI Advocate - H R JADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court disposed of a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) as withdrawn following the complainant's withdrawal petition submitted through their advocate at the National Lok-Adalat. The accused was acquitted of the offense, with no order for costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  13. 12-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  14. 14-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  15. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  16. 17-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  17. 04-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  18. 04-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  19. 21-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  20. 31-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  21. 13-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 09-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 204/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) as withdrawn following the complainant's withdrawal petition submitted through their advocate at the National Lok-Adalat. The accused was acquitted of the offense, with no order for costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case