HEIRS OF LATE HIRABHAI LAXMANBHAI BHARWAD(Legal Heir) vs HARESHBHAI KALUBHAI BHARWAD Advocate - UNSERVED — 11/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJAH240018512025

Filing Number

11/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41

Petitioner(s)

1.HEIRS OF LATE HIRABHAI LAXMANBHAI BHARWAD(Legal Heir)

Adv. J R PATEL1.
2.HARDIK RAMBHAI BHARWAD 1.
3.PIYUSH RAMBHAI BHARWAD 1.
4.UMANG RAMBHAI BHARWAD

Adv. S R PATHAN1.
5.ANAND JAYANTIBHAI BHARWAD 1.
6.PAYALBEN JAYANTIBHAI BHARWAD 1.
7.PRIYANKABEN JAYANTIBHAI BHARWAD 1.
8.GITABEN HIRABHAI BHARWAD W/O VINODBHAI 1.
9.DEVALBEN W/O LATE HIRABHAI LAXMANBHAI
10.HEIRS OF LATE KARMANBHAI LAXMANBHAI BHARWAD(Legal Heir) 2.
11.BALDEVBHAI KARMANBHAI BHARWAD 2.
12.VIJAY KARMANBHAI BHARWAD 2.
13.MAHESH KARMANBHAI BHRWAD 2.
14.VISHNU KARMANBHAI BHARWAD 2.
15.MADHUBEN KARMANBHAI BHARWAD 2.
16.LAXMIBEN KARMANBHAI BHARWAD 2.
17.JASHIBEN KARMANBHAI BHARWAD 2.
18.PINALBEN KARMANBHAI BHARWAD W/O ANKITBHAI

Respondent(s)

1.HARESHBHAI KALUBHAI BHARWAD Advocate - UNSERVED
2.VIJUBEN W/O HARESHBHAI BHARWAD

Adv. UNSERVED
3.MINOR VIVEKKUMAR HARESHBHAI BHARWAD

Adv. UNSERVED
4.MINOR MITKUMAR HARESHBHAI BHARWAD

Adv. UNSERVED

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
28-Apr-2026

JudegementView PDF

Summary The Court of Additional District Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Dholka dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, which had allowed the plaintiff's suit for cancellation of two allegedly fraudulent registered sale deeds of agricultural land. The court found that the defendants' predecessors were not agriculturists at the time of the sales in 2004, thereby violating the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948, and that the transactions lacked genuine consideration, making them void from inception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
28-Apr-2026

Disposed

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
23-Apr-2026

Judgement

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
06-Apr-2026

Judgement

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
30-Mar-2026

Judgement

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
27-Mar-2026

Judgement

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
23-Mar-2026

Judgement

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
18-Mar-2026

Judgement

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
11-Mar-2026

Final Arguments

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
05-Mar-2026

Final Arguments

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
02-Mar-2026

Admission/Urgent Hearing

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
05-Feb-2026

Admission/Urgent Hearing

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
28-Jan-2026

Admission/Urgent Hearing

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
12-Jan-2026

Admission/Urgent Hearing

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
09-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Nov-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 11/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Additional District Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Dholka dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, which had allowed the plaintiff's suit for cancellation of two allegedly fraudulent registered sale deeds of agricultural land. The court found that the defendants' predecessors were not agriculturists at the time of the sales in 2004, thereby violating the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948, and that the transactions lacked genuine consideration, making them void from inception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.