HANSHABEN BHADRESHBHAI URFE BHALABHAI SENVA vs GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION — 33/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 03rd April 2026.

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJAH240002832026

Case disposed

Filing Number

33/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

2-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

HANSHABEN BHADRESHBHAI URFE BHALABHAI SENVA

Adv. D N VAKIL

MITALBEN BHADRESHBHAI URFE BHALABHAI SENVA

Respondent(s)

GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Hearing History

Judge: 2-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

03-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

URGENT HEARING

01-04-2026

URGENT HEARING

30-03-2026

URGENT HEARING

24-03-2026

URGENT HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court granted the petition and approved withdrawal of fixed deposits totaling ₹2,61,220 from two bank accounts held in the appellants' names, finding the appellants are in financial hardship and the funds are necessary for their daughter's marriage expenses. The court rejected arguments opposing the withdrawal, holding that the appellants lacked sufficient means and the funds served no other purpose, thereby justifying release of the deposits for the wedding arrangements according to social customs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petition and approved withdrawal of fixed deposits totaling ₹2,61,220 from two bank accounts held in the appellants' names, finding the appellants are in financial hardship and the funds are necessary for their daughter's marriage expenses. The court rejected arguments opposing the withdrawal, holding that the appellants lacked sufficient means and the funds served no other purpose, thereby justifying release of the deposits for the wedding arrangements according to social customs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Addl. Court Dholka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case