HANSHABEN BHADRESHBHAI URFE BHALABHAI SENVA vs GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION — 33/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 03rd April 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH240002832026
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
Addl. Court Dholka
Judge
2-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HANSHABEN BHADRESHBHAI URFE BHALABHAI SENVA
Adv. D N VAKIL
MITALBEN BHADRESHBHAI URFE BHALABHAI SENVA
Respondent(s)
GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Hearing History
Judge: 2-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 01-04-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 30-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the petition and approved withdrawal of fixed deposits totaling ₹2,61,220 from two bank accounts held in the appellants' names, finding the appellants are in financial hardship and the funds are necessary for their daughter's marriage expenses. The court rejected arguments opposing the withdrawal, holding that the appellants lacked sufficient means and the funds served no other purpose, thereby justifying release of the deposits for the wedding arrangements according to social customs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the petition and approved withdrawal of fixed deposits totaling ₹2,61,220 from two bank accounts held in the appellants' names, finding the appellants are in financial hardship and the funds are necessary for their daughter's marriage expenses. The court rejected arguments opposing the withdrawal, holding that the appellants lacked sufficient means and the funds served no other purpose, thereby justifying release of the deposits for the wedding arrangements according to social customs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts