DHARMENDRABHAI JESINGBHAI CHAUHAN (KO. PATEL) vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 75/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH240002672026
Filing Number
75/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
75/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Addl. Court Dholka
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192008200113
Police Station
BAVLA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHARMENDRABHAI JESINGBHAI CHAUHAN (KO. PATEL)
Respondent(s)
THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 20-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District & Sessions Judge rejected the temporary bail application of Dharmendrabhai Jesingbhai Chauhan, who sought 30 days bail citing family hardship. The court found the humanitarian grounds unsatisfactory since his wife resides with her parents and his younger brother can support the elderly parents. The court emphasized the gravity of the offense—murder by mattock blow—and concerns that release posed risks to the complainant, witnesses, and evidence, coupled with likelihood of bail jumping, particularly given earlier bail rejections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District & Sessions Judge rejected the temporary bail application of Dharmendrabhai Jesingbhai Chauhan, who sought 30 days bail citing family hardship. The court found the humanitarian grounds unsatisfactory since his wife resides with her parents and his younger brother can support the elderly parents. The court emphasized the gravity of the offense—murder by mattock blow—and concerns that release posed risks to the complainant, witnesses, and evidence, coupled with likelihood of bail jumping, particularly given earlier bail rejections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts