TARIKAHMAD URFE KAKUBHAI ABDULBHAI VHORA vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 69/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH240002582026

Case disposed

Filing Number

69/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

ACB AhmedabadRural

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483(1)

Petitioner(s)

TARIKAHMAD URFE KAKUBHAI ABDULBHAI VHORA

Adv. M R VAIDHYA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

HEARING

20-03-2026

HEARING

18-03-2026

HEARING

17-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) partly allowed the application of Tarikahmad Vhora seeking passport release for one year with permission to travel abroad on corruption charges. The court extended the passport deposit deadline to 31.07.2026 instead of granting full one-year permission, considering the applicant's business needs, prior compliance with court orders, and Rs. 3 lakh security deposit, while imposing conditions against misuse of liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) partly allowed the application of Tarikahmad Vhora seeking passport release for one year with permission to travel abroad on corruption charges. The court extended the passport deposit deadline to 31.07.2026 instead of granting full one-year permission, considering the applicant's business needs, prior compliance with court orders, and Rs. 3 lakh security deposit, while imposing conditions against misuse of liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. Court Dholka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case