SRIDHAR ANJAYA MOMENDICHETTY vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 61/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH240002282026

Filing Number

61/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192020250569

Police Station

Dholka Town Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRIDHAR ANJAYA MOMENDICHETTY

    Adv. K N JADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Dholka rejected the bail application of Shridhar Anjaya Momendichetty in a second successive bail plea filed after charge-sheet submission. The court found prima-facie evidence of serious human trafficking offences involving the kidnapping and sale of minor children for monetary gain, with the applicant allegedly involved in trafficking six prior victims. The court applied Supreme Court precedent holding that once a charge-sheet is filed, courts should not grant bail on grounds of innocence but rather direct accused to seek discharge, and rejected the parity argument since the applicant's role differed substantially from a co-accused granted bail earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 03-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  23. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  24. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Dholka rejected the bail application of Shridhar Anjaya Momendichetty in a second successive bail plea filed after charge-sheet submission. The court found prima-facie evidence of serious human trafficking offences involving the kidnapping and sale of minor children for monetary gain, with the applicant allegedly involved in trafficking six prior victims. The court applied Supreme Court precedent holding that once a charge-sheet is filed, courts should not grant bail on grounds of innocence but rather direct accused to seek discharge, and rejected the parity argument since the applicant's role differed substantially from a co-accused granted bail earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case