JASKARANPRITSINGH URFE JASSI KARNELSINGH JAT vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 60/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH240002272026

Case disposed

Filing Number

60/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

60/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192029250144

Police Station

KOTH POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

JASKARANPRITSINGH URFE JASSI KARNELSINGH JAT

Adv. S B PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL

ILIYASBHAI RASULBHAI BHOHARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

ORDER

17-03-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
ORDER

The court granted regular bail to the accused Jaskaranpritsingh, charged in a POCSO case involving the abduction and sexual abuse of a 16-year-old minor girl. The court found that while the accused provided financial support to the main accused, his role was less culpable, and a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail, warranting parity; the court balanced the accused's personal liberty against societal interest, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." The bail was granted with stringent conditions including a Rs. 15,000 surety, surrender of passport, non-involvement in offenses, and mandatory court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to the accused Jaskaranpritsingh, charged in a POCSO case involving the abduction and sexual abuse of a 16-year-old minor girl. The court found that while the accused provided financial support to the main accused, his role was less culpable, and a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail, warranting parity; the court balanced the accused's personal liberty against societal interest, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." The bail was granted with stringent conditions including a Rs. 15,000 surety, surrender of passport, non-involvement in offenses, and mandatory court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. Court Dholka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case