JASKARANPRITSINGH URFE JASSI KARNELSINGH JAT vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 60/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH240002272026
Filing Number
60/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
60/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Addl. Court Dholka
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192029250144
Police Station
KOTH POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JASKARANPRITSINGH URFE JASSI KARNELSINGH JAT
Adv. S B PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL
ILIYASBHAI RASULBHAI BHOHARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted regular bail to the accused Jaskaranpritsingh, charged in a POCSO case involving the abduction and sexual abuse of a 16-year-old minor girl. The court found that while the accused provided financial support to the main accused, his role was less culpable, and a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail, warranting parity; the court balanced the accused's personal liberty against societal interest, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." The bail was granted with stringent conditions including a Rs. 15,000 surety, surrender of passport, non-involvement in offenses, and mandatory court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted regular bail to the accused Jaskaranpritsingh, charged in a POCSO case involving the abduction and sexual abuse of a 16-year-old minor girl. The court found that while the accused provided financial support to the main accused, his role was less culpable, and a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail, warranting parity; the court balanced the accused's personal liberty against societal interest, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." The bail was granted with stringent conditions including a Rs. 15,000 surety, surrender of passport, non-involvement in offenses, and mandatory court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts